diff options
author | Valentin Popov <valentin@popov.link> | 2024-01-08 00:21:28 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Valentin Popov <valentin@popov.link> | 2024-01-08 00:21:28 +0300 |
commit | 1b6a04ca5504955c571d1c97504fb45ea0befee4 (patch) | |
tree | 7579f518b23313e8a9748a88ab6173d5e030b227 /vendor/clap_builder/src/builder/debug_asserts.rs | |
parent | 5ecd8cf2cba827454317368b68571df0d13d7842 (diff) | |
download | fparkan-1b6a04ca5504955c571d1c97504fb45ea0befee4.tar.xz fparkan-1b6a04ca5504955c571d1c97504fb45ea0befee4.zip |
Initial vendor packages
Signed-off-by: Valentin Popov <valentin@popov.link>
Diffstat (limited to 'vendor/clap_builder/src/builder/debug_asserts.rs')
-rw-r--r-- | vendor/clap_builder/src/builder/debug_asserts.rs | 840 |
1 files changed, 840 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/vendor/clap_builder/src/builder/debug_asserts.rs b/vendor/clap_builder/src/builder/debug_asserts.rs new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2b63384 --- /dev/null +++ b/vendor/clap_builder/src/builder/debug_asserts.rs @@ -0,0 +1,840 @@ +use std::cmp::Ordering; + +use crate::builder::ValueRange; +use crate::mkeymap::KeyType; +use crate::util::FlatSet; +use crate::util::Id; +use crate::ArgAction; +use crate::INTERNAL_ERROR_MSG; +use crate::{Arg, Command, ValueHint}; + +pub(crate) fn assert_app(cmd: &Command) { + debug!("Command::_debug_asserts"); + + let mut short_flags = vec![]; + let mut long_flags = vec![]; + + // Invalid version flag settings + if cmd.get_version().is_none() && cmd.get_long_version().is_none() { + // PropagateVersion is meaningless if there is no version + assert!( + !cmd.is_propagate_version_set(), + "Command {}: No version information via Command::version or Command::long_version to propagate", + cmd.get_name(), + ); + + // Used `Command::mut_arg("version", ..) but did not provide any version information to display + let version_needed = cmd + .get_arguments() + .filter(|x| matches!(x.get_action(), ArgAction::Version)) + .map(|x| x.get_id()) + .collect::<Vec<_>>(); + + assert_eq!(version_needed, Vec::<&str>::new(), "Command {}: `ArgAction::Version` used without providing Command::version or Command::long_version" + ,cmd.get_name() + ); + } + + for sc in cmd.get_subcommands() { + if let Some(s) = sc.get_short_flag().as_ref() { + short_flags.push(Flag::Command(format!("-{s}"), sc.get_name())); + } + + for short_alias in sc.get_all_short_flag_aliases() { + short_flags.push(Flag::Command(format!("-{short_alias}"), sc.get_name())); + } + + if let Some(l) = sc.get_long_flag().as_ref() { + assert!(!l.starts_with('-'), "Command {}: long_flag {:?} must not start with a `-`, that will be handled by the parser", sc.get_name(), l); + long_flags.push(Flag::Command(format!("--{l}"), sc.get_name())); + } + + for long_alias in sc.get_all_long_flag_aliases() { + long_flags.push(Flag::Command(format!("--{long_alias}"), sc.get_name())); + } + } + + for arg in cmd.get_arguments() { + assert_arg(arg); + + assert!( + !cmd.is_multicall_set(), + "Command {}: Arguments like {} cannot be set on a multicall command", + cmd.get_name(), + arg.get_id() + ); + + if let Some(s) = arg.get_short() { + short_flags.push(Flag::Arg(format!("-{s}"), arg.get_id().as_str())); + } + + for (short_alias, _) in &arg.short_aliases { + short_flags.push(Flag::Arg(format!("-{short_alias}"), arg.get_id().as_str())); + } + + if let Some(l) = arg.get_long() { + assert!(!l.starts_with('-'), "Argument {}: long {:?} must not start with a `-`, that will be handled by the parser", arg.get_id(), l); + long_flags.push(Flag::Arg(format!("--{l}"), arg.get_id().as_str())); + } + + for (long_alias, _) in &arg.aliases { + long_flags.push(Flag::Arg(format!("--{long_alias}"), arg.get_id().as_str())); + } + + // Name conflicts + if let Some((first, second)) = cmd.two_args_of(|x| x.get_id() == arg.get_id()) { + panic!( + "Command {}: Argument names must be unique, but '{}' is in use by more than one argument or group{}", + cmd.get_name(), + arg.get_id(), + duplicate_tip(cmd, first, second), + ); + } + + // Long conflicts + if let Some(l) = arg.get_long() { + if let Some((first, second)) = cmd.two_args_of(|x| x.get_long() == Some(l)) { + panic!( + "Command {}: Long option names must be unique for each argument, \ + but '--{}' is in use by both '{}' and '{}'{}", + cmd.get_name(), + l, + first.get_id(), + second.get_id(), + duplicate_tip(cmd, first, second) + ) + } + } + + // Short conflicts + if let Some(s) = arg.get_short() { + if let Some((first, second)) = cmd.two_args_of(|x| x.get_short() == Some(s)) { + panic!( + "Command {}: Short option names must be unique for each argument, \ + but '-{}' is in use by both '{}' and '{}'{}", + cmd.get_name(), + s, + first.get_id(), + second.get_id(), + duplicate_tip(cmd, first, second), + ) + } + } + + // Index conflicts + if let Some(idx) = arg.index { + if let Some((first, second)) = + cmd.two_args_of(|x| x.is_positional() && x.get_index() == Some(idx)) + { + panic!( + "Command {}: Argument '{}' has the same index as '{}' \ + and they are both positional arguments\n\n\t \ + Use `Arg::num_args(1..)` to allow one \ + positional argument to take multiple values", + cmd.get_name(), + first.get_id(), + second.get_id() + ) + } + } + + // requires, r_if, r_unless + for req in &arg.requires { + assert!( + cmd.id_exists(&req.1), + "Command {}: Argument or group '{}' specified in 'requires*' for '{}' does not exist", + cmd.get_name(), + req.1, + arg.get_id(), + ); + } + + for req in &arg.r_ifs { + assert!( + !arg.is_required_set(), + "Argument {}: `required` conflicts with `required_if_eq*`", + arg.get_id() + ); + assert!( + cmd.id_exists(&req.0), + "Command {}: Argument or group '{}' specified in 'required_if_eq*' for '{}' does not exist", + cmd.get_name(), + req.0, + arg.get_id() + ); + } + + for req in &arg.r_ifs_all { + assert!( + !arg.is_required_set(), + "Argument {}: `required` conflicts with `required_if_eq_all`", + arg.get_id() + ); + assert!( + cmd.id_exists(&req.0), + "Command {}: Argument or group '{}' specified in 'required_if_eq_all' for '{}' does not exist", + cmd.get_name(), + req.0, + arg.get_id() + ); + } + + for req in &arg.r_unless { + assert!( + !arg.is_required_set(), + "Argument {}: `required` conflicts with `required_unless*`", + arg.get_id() + ); + assert!( + cmd.id_exists(req), + "Command {}: Argument or group '{}' specified in 'required_unless*' for '{}' does not exist", + cmd.get_name(), + req, + arg.get_id(), + ); + } + + for req in &arg.r_unless_all { + assert!( + !arg.is_required_set(), + "Argument {}: `required` conflicts with `required_unless*`", + arg.get_id() + ); + assert!( + cmd.id_exists(req), + "Command {}: Argument or group '{}' specified in 'required_unless*' for '{}' does not exist", + cmd.get_name(), + req, + arg.get_id(), + ); + } + + // blacklist + for req in &arg.blacklist { + assert!( + cmd.id_exists(req), + "Command {}: Argument or group '{}' specified in 'conflicts_with*' for '{}' does not exist", + cmd.get_name(), + req, + arg.get_id(), + ); + } + + // overrides + for req in &arg.overrides { + assert!( + cmd.id_exists(req), + "Command {}: Argument or group '{}' specified in 'overrides_with*' for '{}' does not exist", + cmd.get_name(), + req, + arg.get_id(), + ); + } + + if arg.is_last_set() { + assert!( + arg.get_long().is_none(), + "Command {}: Flags or Options cannot have last(true) set. '{}' has both a long and last(true) set.", + cmd.get_name(), + arg.get_id() + ); + assert!( + arg.get_short().is_none(), + "Command {}: Flags or Options cannot have last(true) set. '{}' has both a short and last(true) set.", + cmd.get_name(), + arg.get_id() + ); + } + + assert!( + !(arg.is_required_set() && arg.is_global_set()), + "Command {}: Global arguments cannot be required.\n\n\t'{}' is marked as both global and required", + cmd.get_name(), + arg.get_id() + ); + + if arg.get_value_hint() == ValueHint::CommandWithArguments { + assert!( + arg.is_positional(), + "Command {}: Argument '{}' has hint CommandWithArguments and must be positional.", + cmd.get_name(), + arg.get_id() + ); + + assert!( + arg.is_trailing_var_arg_set() || arg.is_last_set(), + "Command {}: Positional argument '{}' has hint CommandWithArguments, so Command must have `trailing_var_arg(true)` or `last(true)` set.", + cmd.get_name(), + arg.get_id() + ); + } + } + + for group in cmd.get_groups() { + // Name conflicts + assert!( + cmd.get_groups().filter(|x| x.id == group.id).count() < 2, + "Command {}: Argument group name must be unique\n\n\t'{}' is already in use", + cmd.get_name(), + group.get_id(), + ); + + // Groups should not have naming conflicts with Args + assert!( + !cmd.get_arguments().any(|x| x.get_id() == group.get_id()), + "Command {}: Argument group name '{}' must not conflict with argument name", + cmd.get_name(), + group.get_id(), + ); + + for arg in &group.args { + // Args listed inside groups should exist + assert!( + cmd.get_arguments().any(|x| x.get_id() == arg), + "Command {}: Argument group '{}' contains non-existent argument '{}'", + cmd.get_name(), + group.get_id(), + arg + ); + } + + for arg in &group.requires { + // Args listed inside groups should exist + assert!( + cmd.id_exists(arg), + "Command {}: Argument group '{}' requires non-existent '{}' id", + cmd.get_name(), + group.get_id(), + arg + ); + } + + for arg in &group.conflicts { + // Args listed inside groups should exist + assert!( + cmd.id_exists(arg), + "Command {}: Argument group '{}' conflicts with non-existent '{}' id", + cmd.get_name(), + group.get_id(), + arg + ); + } + } + + // Conflicts between flags and subcommands + + long_flags.sort_unstable(); + short_flags.sort_unstable(); + + detect_duplicate_flags(&long_flags, "long"); + detect_duplicate_flags(&short_flags, "short"); + + let mut subs = FlatSet::new(); + for sc in cmd.get_subcommands() { + assert!( + subs.insert(sc.get_name()), + "Command {}: command name `{}` is duplicated", + cmd.get_name(), + sc.get_name() + ); + for alias in sc.get_all_aliases() { + assert!( + subs.insert(alias), + "Command {}: command `{}` alias `{}` is duplicated", + cmd.get_name(), + sc.get_name(), + alias + ); + } + } + + _verify_positionals(cmd); + + #[cfg(feature = "help")] + if let Some(help_template) = cmd.get_help_template() { + assert!( + !help_template.to_string().contains("{flags}"), + "Command {}: {}", + cmd.get_name(), + "`{flags}` template variable was removed in clap3, they are now included in `{options}`", + ); + assert!( + !help_template.to_string().contains("{unified}"), + "Command {}: {}", + cmd.get_name(), + "`{unified}` template variable was removed in clap3, use `{options}` instead" + ); + #[cfg(feature = "unstable-v5")] + assert!( + !help_template.to_string().contains("{bin}"), + "Command {}: {}", + cmd.get_name(), + "`{bin}` template variable was removed in clap5, use `{name}` instead" + ) + } + + cmd._panic_on_missing_help(cmd.is_help_expected_set()); + assert_app_flags(cmd); +} + +fn duplicate_tip(cmd: &Command, first: &Arg, second: &Arg) -> &'static str { + if !cmd.is_disable_help_flag_set() + && (first.get_id() == Id::HELP || second.get_id() == Id::HELP) + { + " (call `cmd.disable_help_flag(true)` to remove the auto-generated `--help`)" + } else if !cmd.is_disable_version_flag_set() + && (first.get_id() == Id::VERSION || second.get_id() == Id::VERSION) + { + " (call `cmd.disable_version_flag(true)` to remove the auto-generated `--version`)" + } else { + "" + } +} + +#[derive(Eq)] +enum Flag<'a> { + Command(String, &'a str), + Arg(String, &'a str), +} + +impl PartialEq for Flag<'_> { + fn eq(&self, other: &Flag) -> bool { + self.cmp(other) == Ordering::Equal + } +} + +impl PartialOrd for Flag<'_> { + fn partial_cmp(&self, other: &Flag) -> Option<Ordering> { + Some(self.cmp(other)) + } +} + +impl Ord for Flag<'_> { + fn cmp(&self, other: &Self) -> Ordering { + use Flag::*; + + match (self, other) { + (Command(s1, _), Command(s2, _)) + | (Arg(s1, _), Arg(s2, _)) + | (Command(s1, _), Arg(s2, _)) + | (Arg(s1, _), Command(s2, _)) => { + if s1 == s2 { + Ordering::Equal + } else { + s1.cmp(s2) + } + } + } + } +} + +fn detect_duplicate_flags(flags: &[Flag], short_or_long: &str) { + use Flag::*; + + for (one, two) in find_duplicates(flags) { + match (one, two) { + (Command(flag, one), Command(_, another)) if one != another => panic!( + "the '{flag}' {short_or_long} flag is specified for both '{one}' and '{another}' subcommands" + ), + + (Arg(flag, one), Arg(_, another)) if one != another => panic!( + "{short_or_long} option names must be unique, but '{flag}' is in use by both '{one}' and '{another}'" + ), + + (Arg(flag, arg), Command(_, sub)) | (Command(flag, sub), Arg(_, arg)) => panic!( + "the '{flag}' {short_or_long} flag for the '{arg}' argument conflicts with the short flag \ + for '{sub}' subcommand" + ), + + _ => {} + } + } +} + +/// Find duplicates in a sorted array. +/// +/// The algorithm is simple: the array is sorted, duplicates +/// must be placed next to each other, we can check only adjacent elements. +fn find_duplicates<T: PartialEq>(slice: &[T]) -> impl Iterator<Item = (&T, &T)> { + slice.windows(2).filter_map(|w| { + if w[0] == w[1] { + Some((&w[0], &w[1])) + } else { + None + } + }) +} + +fn assert_app_flags(cmd: &Command) { + macro_rules! checker { + ($a:ident requires $($b:ident)|+) => { + if cmd.$a() { + let mut s = String::new(); + + $( + if !cmd.$b() { + use std::fmt::Write; + write!(&mut s, " AppSettings::{} is required when AppSettings::{} is set.\n", std::stringify!($b), std::stringify!($a)).unwrap(); + } + )+ + + if !s.is_empty() { + panic!("{s}") + } + } + }; + ($a:ident conflicts $($b:ident)|+) => { + if cmd.$a() { + let mut s = String::new(); + + $( + if cmd.$b() { + use std::fmt::Write; + write!(&mut s, " AppSettings::{} conflicts with AppSettings::{}.\n", std::stringify!($b), std::stringify!($a)).unwrap(); + } + )+ + + if !s.is_empty() { + panic!("{}\n{}", cmd.get_name(), s) + } + } + }; + } + + checker!(is_multicall_set conflicts is_no_binary_name_set); +} + +#[cfg(debug_assertions)] +fn _verify_positionals(cmd: &Command) -> bool { + debug!("Command::_verify_positionals"); + // Because you must wait until all arguments have been supplied, this is the first chance + // to make assertions on positional argument indexes + // + // First we verify that the index highest supplied index, is equal to the number of + // positional arguments to verify there are no gaps (i.e. supplying an index of 1 and 3 + // but no 2) + + let highest_idx = cmd + .get_keymap() + .keys() + .filter_map(|x| { + if let KeyType::Position(n) = x { + Some(*n) + } else { + None + } + }) + .max() + .unwrap_or(0); + + let num_p = cmd.get_keymap().keys().filter(|x| x.is_position()).count(); + + assert!( + highest_idx == num_p, + "Found positional argument whose index is {highest_idx} but there \ + are only {num_p} positional arguments defined", + ); + + for arg in cmd.get_arguments() { + if arg.index.unwrap_or(0) == highest_idx { + assert!( + !arg.is_trailing_var_arg_set() || !arg.is_last_set(), + "{}:{}: `Arg::trailing_var_arg` and `Arg::last` cannot be used together", + cmd.get_name(), + arg.get_id() + ); + + if arg.is_trailing_var_arg_set() { + assert!( + arg.is_multiple(), + "{}:{}: `Arg::trailing_var_arg` must accept multiple values", + cmd.get_name(), + arg.get_id() + ); + } + } else { + assert!( + !arg.is_trailing_var_arg_set(), + "{}:{}: `Arg::trailing_var_arg` can only apply to last positional", + cmd.get_name(), + arg.get_id() + ); + } + } + + // Next we verify that only the highest index has takes multiple arguments (if any) + let only_highest = |a: &Arg| a.is_multiple() && (a.get_index().unwrap_or(0) != highest_idx); + if cmd.get_positionals().any(only_highest) { + // First we make sure if there is a positional that allows multiple values + // the one before it (second to last) has one of these: + // * a value terminator + // * ArgSettings::Last + // * The last arg is Required + + // We can't pass the closure (it.next()) to the macro directly because each call to + // find() (iterator, not macro) gets called repeatedly. + let last = &cmd.get_keymap()[&KeyType::Position(highest_idx)]; + let second_to_last = &cmd.get_keymap()[&KeyType::Position(highest_idx - 1)]; + + // Either the final positional is required + // Or the second to last has a terminator or .last(true) set + let ok = last.is_required_set() + || (second_to_last.terminator.is_some() || second_to_last.is_last_set()) + || last.is_last_set(); + assert!( + ok, + "Positional argument `{last}` *must* have `required(true)` or `last(true)` set \ + because a prior positional argument (`{second_to_last}`) has `num_args(1..)`" + ); + + // We make sure if the second to last is Multiple the last is ArgSettings::Last + let ok = second_to_last.is_multiple() || last.is_last_set(); + assert!( + ok, + "Only the last positional argument, or second to last positional \ + argument may be set to `.num_args(1..)`" + ); + + // Next we check how many have both Multiple and not a specific number of values set + let count = cmd + .get_positionals() + .filter(|p| { + p.is_multiple_values_set() + && p.get_value_terminator().is_none() + && !p.get_num_args().expect(INTERNAL_ERROR_MSG).is_fixed() + }) + .count(); + let ok = count <= 1 + || (last.is_last_set() + && last.is_multiple() + && second_to_last.is_multiple() + && count == 2); + assert!( + ok, + "Only one positional argument with `.num_args(1..)` set is allowed per \ + command, unless the second one also has .last(true) set" + ); + } + + let mut found = false; + + if cmd.is_allow_missing_positional_set() { + // Check that if a required positional argument is found, all positions with a lower + // index are also required. + let mut foundx2 = false; + + for p in cmd.get_positionals() { + if foundx2 && !p.is_required_set() { + assert!( + p.is_required_set(), + "Found non-required positional argument with a lower \ + index than a required positional argument by two or more: {:?} \ + index {:?}", + p.get_id(), + p.get_index() + ); + } else if p.is_required_set() && !p.is_last_set() { + // Args that .last(true) don't count since they can be required and have + // positionals with a lower index that aren't required + // Imagine: prog <req1> [opt1] -- <req2> + // Both of these are valid invocations: + // $ prog r1 -- r2 + // $ prog r1 o1 -- r2 + if found { + foundx2 = true; + continue; + } + found = true; + continue; + } else { + found = false; + } + } + } else { + // Check that if a required positional argument is found, all positions with a lower + // index are also required + for p in (1..=num_p).rev().filter_map(|n| cmd.get_keymap().get(&n)) { + if found { + assert!( + p.is_required_set(), + "Found non-required positional argument with a lower \ + index than a required positional argument: {:?} index {:?}", + p.get_id(), + p.get_index() + ); + } else if p.is_required_set() && !p.is_last_set() { + // Args that .last(true) don't count since they can be required and have + // positionals with a lower index that aren't required + // Imagine: prog <req1> [opt1] -- <req2> + // Both of these are valid invocations: + // $ prog r1 -- r2 + // $ prog r1 o1 -- r2 + found = true; + continue; + } + } + } + assert!( + cmd.get_positionals().filter(|p| p.is_last_set()).count() < 2, + "Only one positional argument may have last(true) set. Found two." + ); + if cmd + .get_positionals() + .any(|p| p.is_last_set() && p.is_required_set()) + && cmd.has_subcommands() + && !cmd.is_subcommand_negates_reqs_set() + { + panic!( + "Having a required positional argument with .last(true) set *and* child \ + subcommands without setting SubcommandsNegateReqs isn't compatible." + ); + } + + true +} + +fn assert_arg(arg: &Arg) { + debug!("Arg::_debug_asserts:{}", arg.get_id()); + + // Self conflict + // TODO: this check should be recursive + assert!( + !arg.blacklist.iter().any(|x| x == arg.get_id()), + "Argument '{}' cannot conflict with itself", + arg.get_id(), + ); + + assert_eq!( + arg.get_action().takes_values(), + arg.is_takes_value_set(), + "Argument `{}`'s selected action {:?} contradicts `takes_value`", + arg.get_id(), + arg.get_action() + ); + if let Some(action_type_id) = arg.get_action().value_type_id() { + assert_eq!( + action_type_id, + arg.get_value_parser().type_id(), + "Argument `{}`'s selected action {:?} contradicts `value_parser` ({:?})", + arg.get_id(), + arg.get_action(), + arg.get_value_parser() + ); + } + + if arg.get_value_hint() != ValueHint::Unknown { + assert!( + arg.is_takes_value_set(), + "Argument '{}' has value hint but takes no value", + arg.get_id() + ); + + if arg.get_value_hint() == ValueHint::CommandWithArguments { + assert!( + arg.is_multiple_values_set(), + "Argument '{}' uses hint CommandWithArguments and must accept multiple values", + arg.get_id() + ) + } + } + + if arg.index.is_some() { + assert!( + arg.is_positional(), + "Argument '{}' is a positional argument and can't have short or long name versions", + arg.get_id() + ); + assert!( + arg.is_takes_value_set(), + "Argument '{}` is positional and it must take a value but action is {:?}{}", + arg.get_id(), + arg.get_action(), + if arg.get_id() == Id::HELP { + " (`mut_arg` no longer works with implicit `--help`)" + } else if arg.get_id() == Id::VERSION { + " (`mut_arg` no longer works with implicit `--version`)" + } else { + "" + } + ); + } + + let num_vals = arg.get_num_args().expect(INTERNAL_ERROR_MSG); + // This can be the cause of later asserts, so put this first + if num_vals != ValueRange::EMPTY { + // HACK: Don't check for flags to make the derive easier + let num_val_names = arg.get_value_names().unwrap_or(&[]).len(); + if num_vals.max_values() < num_val_names { + panic!( + "Argument {}: Too many value names ({}) compared to `num_args` ({})", + arg.get_id(), + num_val_names, + num_vals + ); + } + } + + assert_eq!( + num_vals.takes_values(), + arg.is_takes_value_set(), + "Argument {}: mismatch between `num_args` ({}) and `takes_value`", + arg.get_id(), + num_vals, + ); + assert_eq!( + num_vals.is_multiple(), + arg.is_multiple_values_set(), + "Argument {}: mismatch between `num_args` ({}) and `multiple_values`", + arg.get_id(), + num_vals, + ); + + if 1 < num_vals.min_values() { + assert!( + !arg.is_require_equals_set(), + "Argument {}: cannot accept more than 1 arg (num_args={}) with require_equals", + arg.get_id(), + num_vals + ); + } + + if num_vals == ValueRange::SINGLE { + assert!( + !arg.is_multiple_values_set(), + "Argument {}: mismatch between `num_args` and `multiple_values`", + arg.get_id() + ); + } + + assert_arg_flags(arg); +} + +fn assert_arg_flags(arg: &Arg) { + macro_rules! checker { + ($a:ident requires $($b:ident)|+) => { + if arg.$a() { + let mut s = String::new(); + + $( + if !arg.$b() { + use std::fmt::Write; + write!(&mut s, " Arg::{} is required when Arg::{} is set.\n", std::stringify!($b), std::stringify!($a)).unwrap(); + } + )+ + + if !s.is_empty() { + panic!("Argument {:?}\n{}", arg.get_id(), s) + } + } + } + } + + checker!(is_hide_possible_values_set requires is_takes_value_set); + checker!(is_allow_hyphen_values_set requires is_takes_value_set); + checker!(is_allow_negative_numbers_set requires is_takes_value_set); + checker!(is_require_equals_set requires is_takes_value_set); + checker!(is_last_set requires is_takes_value_set); + checker!(is_hide_default_value_set requires is_takes_value_set); + checker!(is_multiple_values_set requires is_takes_value_set); + checker!(is_ignore_case_set requires is_takes_value_set); +} |