From a990de90fe41456a23e58bd087d2f107d321f3a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Valentin Popov Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 16:37:58 +0400 Subject: Deleted vendor folder --- vendor/proc-macro2/src/detection.rs | 75 ------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 75 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 vendor/proc-macro2/src/detection.rs (limited to 'vendor/proc-macro2/src/detection.rs') diff --git a/vendor/proc-macro2/src/detection.rs b/vendor/proc-macro2/src/detection.rs deleted file mode 100644 index beba7b2..0000000 --- a/vendor/proc-macro2/src/detection.rs +++ /dev/null @@ -1,75 +0,0 @@ -use core::sync::atomic::{AtomicUsize, Ordering}; -use std::sync::Once; - -static WORKS: AtomicUsize = AtomicUsize::new(0); -static INIT: Once = Once::new(); - -pub(crate) fn inside_proc_macro() -> bool { - match WORKS.load(Ordering::Relaxed) { - 1 => return false, - 2 => return true, - _ => {} - } - - INIT.call_once(initialize); - inside_proc_macro() -} - -pub(crate) fn force_fallback() { - WORKS.store(1, Ordering::Relaxed); -} - -pub(crate) fn unforce_fallback() { - initialize(); -} - -#[cfg(not(no_is_available))] -fn initialize() { - let available = proc_macro::is_available(); - WORKS.store(available as usize + 1, Ordering::Relaxed); -} - -// Swap in a null panic hook to avoid printing "thread panicked" to stderr, -// then use catch_unwind to determine whether the compiler's proc_macro is -// working. When proc-macro2 is used from outside of a procedural macro all -// of the proc_macro crate's APIs currently panic. -// -// The Once is to prevent the possibility of this ordering: -// -// thread 1 calls take_hook, gets the user's original hook -// thread 1 calls set_hook with the null hook -// thread 2 calls take_hook, thinks null hook is the original hook -// thread 2 calls set_hook with the null hook -// thread 1 calls set_hook with the actual original hook -// thread 2 calls set_hook with what it thinks is the original hook -// -// in which the user's hook has been lost. -// -// There is still a race condition where a panic in a different thread can -// happen during the interval that the user's original panic hook is -// unregistered such that their hook is incorrectly not called. This is -// sufficiently unlikely and less bad than printing panic messages to stderr -// on correct use of this crate. Maybe there is a libstd feature request -// here. For now, if a user needs to guarantee that this failure mode does -// not occur, they need to call e.g. `proc_macro2::Span::call_site()` from -// the main thread before launching any other threads. -#[cfg(no_is_available)] -fn initialize() { - use std::panic::{self, PanicInfo}; - - type PanicHook = dyn Fn(&PanicInfo) + Sync + Send + 'static; - - let null_hook: Box = Box::new(|_panic_info| { /* ignore */ }); - let sanity_check = &*null_hook as *const PanicHook; - let original_hook = panic::take_hook(); - panic::set_hook(null_hook); - - let works = panic::catch_unwind(proc_macro::Span::call_site).is_ok(); - WORKS.store(works as usize + 1, Ordering::Relaxed); - - let hopefully_null_hook = panic::take_hook(); - panic::set_hook(original_hook); - if sanity_check != &*hopefully_null_hook { - panic!("observed race condition in proc_macro2::inside_proc_macro"); - } -} -- cgit v1.2.3