From a990de90fe41456a23e58bd087d2f107d321f3a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Valentin Popov Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 16:37:58 +0400 Subject: Deleted vendor folder --- vendor/rayon-core/src/join/mod.rs | 188 -------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 188 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 vendor/rayon-core/src/join/mod.rs (limited to 'vendor/rayon-core/src/join/mod.rs') diff --git a/vendor/rayon-core/src/join/mod.rs b/vendor/rayon-core/src/join/mod.rs deleted file mode 100644 index 5ab9f6b..0000000 --- a/vendor/rayon-core/src/join/mod.rs +++ /dev/null @@ -1,188 +0,0 @@ -use crate::job::StackJob; -use crate::latch::SpinLatch; -use crate::registry::{self, WorkerThread}; -use crate::unwind; -use std::any::Any; - -use crate::FnContext; - -#[cfg(test)] -mod test; - -/// Takes two closures and *potentially* runs them in parallel. It -/// returns a pair of the results from those closures. -/// -/// Conceptually, calling `join()` is similar to spawning two threads, -/// one executing each of the two closures. However, the -/// implementation is quite different and incurs very low -/// overhead. The underlying technique is called "work stealing": the -/// Rayon runtime uses a fixed pool of worker threads and attempts to -/// only execute code in parallel when there are idle CPUs to handle -/// it. -/// -/// When `join` is called from outside the thread pool, the calling -/// thread will block while the closures execute in the pool. When -/// `join` is called within the pool, the calling thread still actively -/// participates in the thread pool. It will begin by executing closure -/// A (on the current thread). While it is doing that, it will advertise -/// closure B as being available for other threads to execute. Once closure A -/// has completed, the current thread will try to execute closure B; -/// if however closure B has been stolen, then it will look for other work -/// while waiting for the thief to fully execute closure B. (This is the -/// typical work-stealing strategy). -/// -/// # Examples -/// -/// This example uses join to perform a quick-sort (note this is not a -/// particularly optimized implementation: if you **actually** want to -/// sort for real, you should prefer [the `par_sort` method] offered -/// by Rayon). -/// -/// [the `par_sort` method]: ../rayon/slice/trait.ParallelSliceMut.html#method.par_sort -/// -/// ```rust -/// # use rayon_core as rayon; -/// let mut v = vec![5, 1, 8, 22, 0, 44]; -/// quick_sort(&mut v); -/// assert_eq!(v, vec![0, 1, 5, 8, 22, 44]); -/// -/// fn quick_sort(v: &mut [T]) { -/// if v.len() > 1 { -/// let mid = partition(v); -/// let (lo, hi) = v.split_at_mut(mid); -/// rayon::join(|| quick_sort(lo), -/// || quick_sort(hi)); -/// } -/// } -/// -/// // Partition rearranges all items `<=` to the pivot -/// // item (arbitrary selected to be the last item in the slice) -/// // to the first half of the slice. It then returns the -/// // "dividing point" where the pivot is placed. -/// fn partition(v: &mut [T]) -> usize { -/// let pivot = v.len() - 1; -/// let mut i = 0; -/// for j in 0..pivot { -/// if v[j] <= v[pivot] { -/// v.swap(i, j); -/// i += 1; -/// } -/// } -/// v.swap(i, pivot); -/// i -/// } -/// ``` -/// -/// # Warning about blocking I/O -/// -/// The assumption is that the closures given to `join()` are -/// CPU-bound tasks that do not perform I/O or other blocking -/// operations. If you do perform I/O, and that I/O should block -/// (e.g., waiting for a network request), the overall performance may -/// be poor. Moreover, if you cause one closure to be blocked waiting -/// on another (for example, using a channel), that could lead to a -/// deadlock. -/// -/// # Panics -/// -/// No matter what happens, both closures will always be executed. If -/// a single closure panics, whether it be the first or second -/// closure, that panic will be propagated and hence `join()` will -/// panic with the same panic value. If both closures panic, `join()` -/// will panic with the panic value from the first closure. -pub fn join(oper_a: A, oper_b: B) -> (RA, RB) -where - A: FnOnce() -> RA + Send, - B: FnOnce() -> RB + Send, - RA: Send, - RB: Send, -{ - #[inline] - fn call(f: impl FnOnce() -> R) -> impl FnOnce(FnContext) -> R { - move |_| f() - } - - join_context(call(oper_a), call(oper_b)) -} - -/// Identical to `join`, except that the closures have a parameter -/// that provides context for the way the closure has been called, -/// especially indicating whether they're executing on a different -/// thread than where `join_context` was called. This will occur if -/// the second job is stolen by a different thread, or if -/// `join_context` was called from outside the thread pool to begin -/// with. -pub fn join_context(oper_a: A, oper_b: B) -> (RA, RB) -where - A: FnOnce(FnContext) -> RA + Send, - B: FnOnce(FnContext) -> RB + Send, - RA: Send, - RB: Send, -{ - #[inline] - fn call_a(f: impl FnOnce(FnContext) -> R, injected: bool) -> impl FnOnce() -> R { - move || f(FnContext::new(injected)) - } - - #[inline] - fn call_b(f: impl FnOnce(FnContext) -> R) -> impl FnOnce(bool) -> R { - move |migrated| f(FnContext::new(migrated)) - } - - registry::in_worker(|worker_thread, injected| unsafe { - // Create virtual wrapper for task b; this all has to be - // done here so that the stack frame can keep it all live - // long enough. - let job_b = StackJob::new(call_b(oper_b), SpinLatch::new(worker_thread)); - let job_b_ref = job_b.as_job_ref(); - let job_b_id = job_b_ref.id(); - worker_thread.push(job_b_ref); - - // Execute task a; hopefully b gets stolen in the meantime. - let status_a = unwind::halt_unwinding(call_a(oper_a, injected)); - let result_a = match status_a { - Ok(v) => v, - Err(err) => join_recover_from_panic(worker_thread, &job_b.latch, err), - }; - - // Now that task A has finished, try to pop job B from the - // local stack. It may already have been popped by job A; it - // may also have been stolen. There may also be some tasks - // pushed on top of it in the stack, and we will have to pop - // those off to get to it. - while !job_b.latch.probe() { - if let Some(job) = worker_thread.take_local_job() { - if job_b_id == job.id() { - // Found it! Let's run it. - // - // Note that this could panic, but it's ok if we unwind here. - let result_b = job_b.run_inline(injected); - return (result_a, result_b); - } else { - worker_thread.execute(job); - } - } else { - // Local deque is empty. Time to steal from other - // threads. - worker_thread.wait_until(&job_b.latch); - debug_assert!(job_b.latch.probe()); - break; - } - } - - (result_a, job_b.into_result()) - }) -} - -/// If job A panics, we still cannot return until we are sure that job -/// B is complete. This is because it may contain references into the -/// enclosing stack frame(s). -#[cold] // cold path -unsafe fn join_recover_from_panic( - worker_thread: &WorkerThread, - job_b_latch: &SpinLatch<'_>, - err: Box, -) -> ! { - worker_thread.wait_until(job_b_latch); - unwind::resume_unwinding(err) -} -- cgit v1.2.3