diff options
author | Valentin Popov <valentin@popov.link> | 2024-07-19 15:37:58 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Valentin Popov <valentin@popov.link> | 2024-07-19 15:37:58 +0300 |
commit | a990de90fe41456a23e58bd087d2f107d321f3a1 (patch) | |
tree | 15afc392522a9e85dc3332235e311b7d39352ea9 /vendor/clap_builder/src/builder/debug_asserts.rs | |
parent | 3d48cd3f81164bbfc1a755dc1d4a9a02f98c8ddd (diff) | |
download | fparkan-a990de90fe41456a23e58bd087d2f107d321f3a1.tar.xz fparkan-a990de90fe41456a23e58bd087d2f107d321f3a1.zip |
Deleted vendor folder
Diffstat (limited to 'vendor/clap_builder/src/builder/debug_asserts.rs')
-rw-r--r-- | vendor/clap_builder/src/builder/debug_asserts.rs | 840 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 840 deletions
diff --git a/vendor/clap_builder/src/builder/debug_asserts.rs b/vendor/clap_builder/src/builder/debug_asserts.rs deleted file mode 100644 index 2b63384..0000000 --- a/vendor/clap_builder/src/builder/debug_asserts.rs +++ /dev/null @@ -1,840 +0,0 @@ -use std::cmp::Ordering; - -use crate::builder::ValueRange; -use crate::mkeymap::KeyType; -use crate::util::FlatSet; -use crate::util::Id; -use crate::ArgAction; -use crate::INTERNAL_ERROR_MSG; -use crate::{Arg, Command, ValueHint}; - -pub(crate) fn assert_app(cmd: &Command) { - debug!("Command::_debug_asserts"); - - let mut short_flags = vec![]; - let mut long_flags = vec![]; - - // Invalid version flag settings - if cmd.get_version().is_none() && cmd.get_long_version().is_none() { - // PropagateVersion is meaningless if there is no version - assert!( - !cmd.is_propagate_version_set(), - "Command {}: No version information via Command::version or Command::long_version to propagate", - cmd.get_name(), - ); - - // Used `Command::mut_arg("version", ..) but did not provide any version information to display - let version_needed = cmd - .get_arguments() - .filter(|x| matches!(x.get_action(), ArgAction::Version)) - .map(|x| x.get_id()) - .collect::<Vec<_>>(); - - assert_eq!(version_needed, Vec::<&str>::new(), "Command {}: `ArgAction::Version` used without providing Command::version or Command::long_version" - ,cmd.get_name() - ); - } - - for sc in cmd.get_subcommands() { - if let Some(s) = sc.get_short_flag().as_ref() { - short_flags.push(Flag::Command(format!("-{s}"), sc.get_name())); - } - - for short_alias in sc.get_all_short_flag_aliases() { - short_flags.push(Flag::Command(format!("-{short_alias}"), sc.get_name())); - } - - if let Some(l) = sc.get_long_flag().as_ref() { - assert!(!l.starts_with('-'), "Command {}: long_flag {:?} must not start with a `-`, that will be handled by the parser", sc.get_name(), l); - long_flags.push(Flag::Command(format!("--{l}"), sc.get_name())); - } - - for long_alias in sc.get_all_long_flag_aliases() { - long_flags.push(Flag::Command(format!("--{long_alias}"), sc.get_name())); - } - } - - for arg in cmd.get_arguments() { - assert_arg(arg); - - assert!( - !cmd.is_multicall_set(), - "Command {}: Arguments like {} cannot be set on a multicall command", - cmd.get_name(), - arg.get_id() - ); - - if let Some(s) = arg.get_short() { - short_flags.push(Flag::Arg(format!("-{s}"), arg.get_id().as_str())); - } - - for (short_alias, _) in &arg.short_aliases { - short_flags.push(Flag::Arg(format!("-{short_alias}"), arg.get_id().as_str())); - } - - if let Some(l) = arg.get_long() { - assert!(!l.starts_with('-'), "Argument {}: long {:?} must not start with a `-`, that will be handled by the parser", arg.get_id(), l); - long_flags.push(Flag::Arg(format!("--{l}"), arg.get_id().as_str())); - } - - for (long_alias, _) in &arg.aliases { - long_flags.push(Flag::Arg(format!("--{long_alias}"), arg.get_id().as_str())); - } - - // Name conflicts - if let Some((first, second)) = cmd.two_args_of(|x| x.get_id() == arg.get_id()) { - panic!( - "Command {}: Argument names must be unique, but '{}' is in use by more than one argument or group{}", - cmd.get_name(), - arg.get_id(), - duplicate_tip(cmd, first, second), - ); - } - - // Long conflicts - if let Some(l) = arg.get_long() { - if let Some((first, second)) = cmd.two_args_of(|x| x.get_long() == Some(l)) { - panic!( - "Command {}: Long option names must be unique for each argument, \ - but '--{}' is in use by both '{}' and '{}'{}", - cmd.get_name(), - l, - first.get_id(), - second.get_id(), - duplicate_tip(cmd, first, second) - ) - } - } - - // Short conflicts - if let Some(s) = arg.get_short() { - if let Some((first, second)) = cmd.two_args_of(|x| x.get_short() == Some(s)) { - panic!( - "Command {}: Short option names must be unique for each argument, \ - but '-{}' is in use by both '{}' and '{}'{}", - cmd.get_name(), - s, - first.get_id(), - second.get_id(), - duplicate_tip(cmd, first, second), - ) - } - } - - // Index conflicts - if let Some(idx) = arg.index { - if let Some((first, second)) = - cmd.two_args_of(|x| x.is_positional() && x.get_index() == Some(idx)) - { - panic!( - "Command {}: Argument '{}' has the same index as '{}' \ - and they are both positional arguments\n\n\t \ - Use `Arg::num_args(1..)` to allow one \ - positional argument to take multiple values", - cmd.get_name(), - first.get_id(), - second.get_id() - ) - } - } - - // requires, r_if, r_unless - for req in &arg.requires { - assert!( - cmd.id_exists(&req.1), - "Command {}: Argument or group '{}' specified in 'requires*' for '{}' does not exist", - cmd.get_name(), - req.1, - arg.get_id(), - ); - } - - for req in &arg.r_ifs { - assert!( - !arg.is_required_set(), - "Argument {}: `required` conflicts with `required_if_eq*`", - arg.get_id() - ); - assert!( - cmd.id_exists(&req.0), - "Command {}: Argument or group '{}' specified in 'required_if_eq*' for '{}' does not exist", - cmd.get_name(), - req.0, - arg.get_id() - ); - } - - for req in &arg.r_ifs_all { - assert!( - !arg.is_required_set(), - "Argument {}: `required` conflicts with `required_if_eq_all`", - arg.get_id() - ); - assert!( - cmd.id_exists(&req.0), - "Command {}: Argument or group '{}' specified in 'required_if_eq_all' for '{}' does not exist", - cmd.get_name(), - req.0, - arg.get_id() - ); - } - - for req in &arg.r_unless { - assert!( - !arg.is_required_set(), - "Argument {}: `required` conflicts with `required_unless*`", - arg.get_id() - ); - assert!( - cmd.id_exists(req), - "Command {}: Argument or group '{}' specified in 'required_unless*' for '{}' does not exist", - cmd.get_name(), - req, - arg.get_id(), - ); - } - - for req in &arg.r_unless_all { - assert!( - !arg.is_required_set(), - "Argument {}: `required` conflicts with `required_unless*`", - arg.get_id() - ); - assert!( - cmd.id_exists(req), - "Command {}: Argument or group '{}' specified in 'required_unless*' for '{}' does not exist", - cmd.get_name(), - req, - arg.get_id(), - ); - } - - // blacklist - for req in &arg.blacklist { - assert!( - cmd.id_exists(req), - "Command {}: Argument or group '{}' specified in 'conflicts_with*' for '{}' does not exist", - cmd.get_name(), - req, - arg.get_id(), - ); - } - - // overrides - for req in &arg.overrides { - assert!( - cmd.id_exists(req), - "Command {}: Argument or group '{}' specified in 'overrides_with*' for '{}' does not exist", - cmd.get_name(), - req, - arg.get_id(), - ); - } - - if arg.is_last_set() { - assert!( - arg.get_long().is_none(), - "Command {}: Flags or Options cannot have last(true) set. '{}' has both a long and last(true) set.", - cmd.get_name(), - arg.get_id() - ); - assert!( - arg.get_short().is_none(), - "Command {}: Flags or Options cannot have last(true) set. '{}' has both a short and last(true) set.", - cmd.get_name(), - arg.get_id() - ); - } - - assert!( - !(arg.is_required_set() && arg.is_global_set()), - "Command {}: Global arguments cannot be required.\n\n\t'{}' is marked as both global and required", - cmd.get_name(), - arg.get_id() - ); - - if arg.get_value_hint() == ValueHint::CommandWithArguments { - assert!( - arg.is_positional(), - "Command {}: Argument '{}' has hint CommandWithArguments and must be positional.", - cmd.get_name(), - arg.get_id() - ); - - assert!( - arg.is_trailing_var_arg_set() || arg.is_last_set(), - "Command {}: Positional argument '{}' has hint CommandWithArguments, so Command must have `trailing_var_arg(true)` or `last(true)` set.", - cmd.get_name(), - arg.get_id() - ); - } - } - - for group in cmd.get_groups() { - // Name conflicts - assert!( - cmd.get_groups().filter(|x| x.id == group.id).count() < 2, - "Command {}: Argument group name must be unique\n\n\t'{}' is already in use", - cmd.get_name(), - group.get_id(), - ); - - // Groups should not have naming conflicts with Args - assert!( - !cmd.get_arguments().any(|x| x.get_id() == group.get_id()), - "Command {}: Argument group name '{}' must not conflict with argument name", - cmd.get_name(), - group.get_id(), - ); - - for arg in &group.args { - // Args listed inside groups should exist - assert!( - cmd.get_arguments().any(|x| x.get_id() == arg), - "Command {}: Argument group '{}' contains non-existent argument '{}'", - cmd.get_name(), - group.get_id(), - arg - ); - } - - for arg in &group.requires { - // Args listed inside groups should exist - assert!( - cmd.id_exists(arg), - "Command {}: Argument group '{}' requires non-existent '{}' id", - cmd.get_name(), - group.get_id(), - arg - ); - } - - for arg in &group.conflicts { - // Args listed inside groups should exist - assert!( - cmd.id_exists(arg), - "Command {}: Argument group '{}' conflicts with non-existent '{}' id", - cmd.get_name(), - group.get_id(), - arg - ); - } - } - - // Conflicts between flags and subcommands - - long_flags.sort_unstable(); - short_flags.sort_unstable(); - - detect_duplicate_flags(&long_flags, "long"); - detect_duplicate_flags(&short_flags, "short"); - - let mut subs = FlatSet::new(); - for sc in cmd.get_subcommands() { - assert!( - subs.insert(sc.get_name()), - "Command {}: command name `{}` is duplicated", - cmd.get_name(), - sc.get_name() - ); - for alias in sc.get_all_aliases() { - assert!( - subs.insert(alias), - "Command {}: command `{}` alias `{}` is duplicated", - cmd.get_name(), - sc.get_name(), - alias - ); - } - } - - _verify_positionals(cmd); - - #[cfg(feature = "help")] - if let Some(help_template) = cmd.get_help_template() { - assert!( - !help_template.to_string().contains("{flags}"), - "Command {}: {}", - cmd.get_name(), - "`{flags}` template variable was removed in clap3, they are now included in `{options}`", - ); - assert!( - !help_template.to_string().contains("{unified}"), - "Command {}: {}", - cmd.get_name(), - "`{unified}` template variable was removed in clap3, use `{options}` instead" - ); - #[cfg(feature = "unstable-v5")] - assert!( - !help_template.to_string().contains("{bin}"), - "Command {}: {}", - cmd.get_name(), - "`{bin}` template variable was removed in clap5, use `{name}` instead" - ) - } - - cmd._panic_on_missing_help(cmd.is_help_expected_set()); - assert_app_flags(cmd); -} - -fn duplicate_tip(cmd: &Command, first: &Arg, second: &Arg) -> &'static str { - if !cmd.is_disable_help_flag_set() - && (first.get_id() == Id::HELP || second.get_id() == Id::HELP) - { - " (call `cmd.disable_help_flag(true)` to remove the auto-generated `--help`)" - } else if !cmd.is_disable_version_flag_set() - && (first.get_id() == Id::VERSION || second.get_id() == Id::VERSION) - { - " (call `cmd.disable_version_flag(true)` to remove the auto-generated `--version`)" - } else { - "" - } -} - -#[derive(Eq)] -enum Flag<'a> { - Command(String, &'a str), - Arg(String, &'a str), -} - -impl PartialEq for Flag<'_> { - fn eq(&self, other: &Flag) -> bool { - self.cmp(other) == Ordering::Equal - } -} - -impl PartialOrd for Flag<'_> { - fn partial_cmp(&self, other: &Flag) -> Option<Ordering> { - Some(self.cmp(other)) - } -} - -impl Ord for Flag<'_> { - fn cmp(&self, other: &Self) -> Ordering { - use Flag::*; - - match (self, other) { - (Command(s1, _), Command(s2, _)) - | (Arg(s1, _), Arg(s2, _)) - | (Command(s1, _), Arg(s2, _)) - | (Arg(s1, _), Command(s2, _)) => { - if s1 == s2 { - Ordering::Equal - } else { - s1.cmp(s2) - } - } - } - } -} - -fn detect_duplicate_flags(flags: &[Flag], short_or_long: &str) { - use Flag::*; - - for (one, two) in find_duplicates(flags) { - match (one, two) { - (Command(flag, one), Command(_, another)) if one != another => panic!( - "the '{flag}' {short_or_long} flag is specified for both '{one}' and '{another}' subcommands" - ), - - (Arg(flag, one), Arg(_, another)) if one != another => panic!( - "{short_or_long} option names must be unique, but '{flag}' is in use by both '{one}' and '{another}'" - ), - - (Arg(flag, arg), Command(_, sub)) | (Command(flag, sub), Arg(_, arg)) => panic!( - "the '{flag}' {short_or_long} flag for the '{arg}' argument conflicts with the short flag \ - for '{sub}' subcommand" - ), - - _ => {} - } - } -} - -/// Find duplicates in a sorted array. -/// -/// The algorithm is simple: the array is sorted, duplicates -/// must be placed next to each other, we can check only adjacent elements. -fn find_duplicates<T: PartialEq>(slice: &[T]) -> impl Iterator<Item = (&T, &T)> { - slice.windows(2).filter_map(|w| { - if w[0] == w[1] { - Some((&w[0], &w[1])) - } else { - None - } - }) -} - -fn assert_app_flags(cmd: &Command) { - macro_rules! checker { - ($a:ident requires $($b:ident)|+) => { - if cmd.$a() { - let mut s = String::new(); - - $( - if !cmd.$b() { - use std::fmt::Write; - write!(&mut s, " AppSettings::{} is required when AppSettings::{} is set.\n", std::stringify!($b), std::stringify!($a)).unwrap(); - } - )+ - - if !s.is_empty() { - panic!("{s}") - } - } - }; - ($a:ident conflicts $($b:ident)|+) => { - if cmd.$a() { - let mut s = String::new(); - - $( - if cmd.$b() { - use std::fmt::Write; - write!(&mut s, " AppSettings::{} conflicts with AppSettings::{}.\n", std::stringify!($b), std::stringify!($a)).unwrap(); - } - )+ - - if !s.is_empty() { - panic!("{}\n{}", cmd.get_name(), s) - } - } - }; - } - - checker!(is_multicall_set conflicts is_no_binary_name_set); -} - -#[cfg(debug_assertions)] -fn _verify_positionals(cmd: &Command) -> bool { - debug!("Command::_verify_positionals"); - // Because you must wait until all arguments have been supplied, this is the first chance - // to make assertions on positional argument indexes - // - // First we verify that the index highest supplied index, is equal to the number of - // positional arguments to verify there are no gaps (i.e. supplying an index of 1 and 3 - // but no 2) - - let highest_idx = cmd - .get_keymap() - .keys() - .filter_map(|x| { - if let KeyType::Position(n) = x { - Some(*n) - } else { - None - } - }) - .max() - .unwrap_or(0); - - let num_p = cmd.get_keymap().keys().filter(|x| x.is_position()).count(); - - assert!( - highest_idx == num_p, - "Found positional argument whose index is {highest_idx} but there \ - are only {num_p} positional arguments defined", - ); - - for arg in cmd.get_arguments() { - if arg.index.unwrap_or(0) == highest_idx { - assert!( - !arg.is_trailing_var_arg_set() || !arg.is_last_set(), - "{}:{}: `Arg::trailing_var_arg` and `Arg::last` cannot be used together", - cmd.get_name(), - arg.get_id() - ); - - if arg.is_trailing_var_arg_set() { - assert!( - arg.is_multiple(), - "{}:{}: `Arg::trailing_var_arg` must accept multiple values", - cmd.get_name(), - arg.get_id() - ); - } - } else { - assert!( - !arg.is_trailing_var_arg_set(), - "{}:{}: `Arg::trailing_var_arg` can only apply to last positional", - cmd.get_name(), - arg.get_id() - ); - } - } - - // Next we verify that only the highest index has takes multiple arguments (if any) - let only_highest = |a: &Arg| a.is_multiple() && (a.get_index().unwrap_or(0) != highest_idx); - if cmd.get_positionals().any(only_highest) { - // First we make sure if there is a positional that allows multiple values - // the one before it (second to last) has one of these: - // * a value terminator - // * ArgSettings::Last - // * The last arg is Required - - // We can't pass the closure (it.next()) to the macro directly because each call to - // find() (iterator, not macro) gets called repeatedly. - let last = &cmd.get_keymap()[&KeyType::Position(highest_idx)]; - let second_to_last = &cmd.get_keymap()[&KeyType::Position(highest_idx - 1)]; - - // Either the final positional is required - // Or the second to last has a terminator or .last(true) set - let ok = last.is_required_set() - || (second_to_last.terminator.is_some() || second_to_last.is_last_set()) - || last.is_last_set(); - assert!( - ok, - "Positional argument `{last}` *must* have `required(true)` or `last(true)` set \ - because a prior positional argument (`{second_to_last}`) has `num_args(1..)`" - ); - - // We make sure if the second to last is Multiple the last is ArgSettings::Last - let ok = second_to_last.is_multiple() || last.is_last_set(); - assert!( - ok, - "Only the last positional argument, or second to last positional \ - argument may be set to `.num_args(1..)`" - ); - - // Next we check how many have both Multiple and not a specific number of values set - let count = cmd - .get_positionals() - .filter(|p| { - p.is_multiple_values_set() - && p.get_value_terminator().is_none() - && !p.get_num_args().expect(INTERNAL_ERROR_MSG).is_fixed() - }) - .count(); - let ok = count <= 1 - || (last.is_last_set() - && last.is_multiple() - && second_to_last.is_multiple() - && count == 2); - assert!( - ok, - "Only one positional argument with `.num_args(1..)` set is allowed per \ - command, unless the second one also has .last(true) set" - ); - } - - let mut found = false; - - if cmd.is_allow_missing_positional_set() { - // Check that if a required positional argument is found, all positions with a lower - // index are also required. - let mut foundx2 = false; - - for p in cmd.get_positionals() { - if foundx2 && !p.is_required_set() { - assert!( - p.is_required_set(), - "Found non-required positional argument with a lower \ - index than a required positional argument by two or more: {:?} \ - index {:?}", - p.get_id(), - p.get_index() - ); - } else if p.is_required_set() && !p.is_last_set() { - // Args that .last(true) don't count since they can be required and have - // positionals with a lower index that aren't required - // Imagine: prog <req1> [opt1] -- <req2> - // Both of these are valid invocations: - // $ prog r1 -- r2 - // $ prog r1 o1 -- r2 - if found { - foundx2 = true; - continue; - } - found = true; - continue; - } else { - found = false; - } - } - } else { - // Check that if a required positional argument is found, all positions with a lower - // index are also required - for p in (1..=num_p).rev().filter_map(|n| cmd.get_keymap().get(&n)) { - if found { - assert!( - p.is_required_set(), - "Found non-required positional argument with a lower \ - index than a required positional argument: {:?} index {:?}", - p.get_id(), - p.get_index() - ); - } else if p.is_required_set() && !p.is_last_set() { - // Args that .last(true) don't count since they can be required and have - // positionals with a lower index that aren't required - // Imagine: prog <req1> [opt1] -- <req2> - // Both of these are valid invocations: - // $ prog r1 -- r2 - // $ prog r1 o1 -- r2 - found = true; - continue; - } - } - } - assert!( - cmd.get_positionals().filter(|p| p.is_last_set()).count() < 2, - "Only one positional argument may have last(true) set. Found two." - ); - if cmd - .get_positionals() - .any(|p| p.is_last_set() && p.is_required_set()) - && cmd.has_subcommands() - && !cmd.is_subcommand_negates_reqs_set() - { - panic!( - "Having a required positional argument with .last(true) set *and* child \ - subcommands without setting SubcommandsNegateReqs isn't compatible." - ); - } - - true -} - -fn assert_arg(arg: &Arg) { - debug!("Arg::_debug_asserts:{}", arg.get_id()); - - // Self conflict - // TODO: this check should be recursive - assert!( - !arg.blacklist.iter().any(|x| x == arg.get_id()), - "Argument '{}' cannot conflict with itself", - arg.get_id(), - ); - - assert_eq!( - arg.get_action().takes_values(), - arg.is_takes_value_set(), - "Argument `{}`'s selected action {:?} contradicts `takes_value`", - arg.get_id(), - arg.get_action() - ); - if let Some(action_type_id) = arg.get_action().value_type_id() { - assert_eq!( - action_type_id, - arg.get_value_parser().type_id(), - "Argument `{}`'s selected action {:?} contradicts `value_parser` ({:?})", - arg.get_id(), - arg.get_action(), - arg.get_value_parser() - ); - } - - if arg.get_value_hint() != ValueHint::Unknown { - assert!( - arg.is_takes_value_set(), - "Argument '{}' has value hint but takes no value", - arg.get_id() - ); - - if arg.get_value_hint() == ValueHint::CommandWithArguments { - assert!( - arg.is_multiple_values_set(), - "Argument '{}' uses hint CommandWithArguments and must accept multiple values", - arg.get_id() - ) - } - } - - if arg.index.is_some() { - assert!( - arg.is_positional(), - "Argument '{}' is a positional argument and can't have short or long name versions", - arg.get_id() - ); - assert!( - arg.is_takes_value_set(), - "Argument '{}` is positional and it must take a value but action is {:?}{}", - arg.get_id(), - arg.get_action(), - if arg.get_id() == Id::HELP { - " (`mut_arg` no longer works with implicit `--help`)" - } else if arg.get_id() == Id::VERSION { - " (`mut_arg` no longer works with implicit `--version`)" - } else { - "" - } - ); - } - - let num_vals = arg.get_num_args().expect(INTERNAL_ERROR_MSG); - // This can be the cause of later asserts, so put this first - if num_vals != ValueRange::EMPTY { - // HACK: Don't check for flags to make the derive easier - let num_val_names = arg.get_value_names().unwrap_or(&[]).len(); - if num_vals.max_values() < num_val_names { - panic!( - "Argument {}: Too many value names ({}) compared to `num_args` ({})", - arg.get_id(), - num_val_names, - num_vals - ); - } - } - - assert_eq!( - num_vals.takes_values(), - arg.is_takes_value_set(), - "Argument {}: mismatch between `num_args` ({}) and `takes_value`", - arg.get_id(), - num_vals, - ); - assert_eq!( - num_vals.is_multiple(), - arg.is_multiple_values_set(), - "Argument {}: mismatch between `num_args` ({}) and `multiple_values`", - arg.get_id(), - num_vals, - ); - - if 1 < num_vals.min_values() { - assert!( - !arg.is_require_equals_set(), - "Argument {}: cannot accept more than 1 arg (num_args={}) with require_equals", - arg.get_id(), - num_vals - ); - } - - if num_vals == ValueRange::SINGLE { - assert!( - !arg.is_multiple_values_set(), - "Argument {}: mismatch between `num_args` and `multiple_values`", - arg.get_id() - ); - } - - assert_arg_flags(arg); -} - -fn assert_arg_flags(arg: &Arg) { - macro_rules! checker { - ($a:ident requires $($b:ident)|+) => { - if arg.$a() { - let mut s = String::new(); - - $( - if !arg.$b() { - use std::fmt::Write; - write!(&mut s, " Arg::{} is required when Arg::{} is set.\n", std::stringify!($b), std::stringify!($a)).unwrap(); - } - )+ - - if !s.is_empty() { - panic!("Argument {:?}\n{}", arg.get_id(), s) - } - } - } - } - - checker!(is_hide_possible_values_set requires is_takes_value_set); - checker!(is_allow_hyphen_values_set requires is_takes_value_set); - checker!(is_allow_negative_numbers_set requires is_takes_value_set); - checker!(is_require_equals_set requires is_takes_value_set); - checker!(is_last_set requires is_takes_value_set); - checker!(is_hide_default_value_set requires is_takes_value_set); - checker!(is_multiple_values_set requires is_takes_value_set); - checker!(is_ignore_case_set requires is_takes_value_set); -} |